Wealth advisory

Envision Wealth is 9 days in at 73% mention and still 0% cited

Four pages. Nine days. Engines say the name. None of them link the site. This is a start, not a finished lift.

9 daysIn market
~73%Mention across engines
0%Cite rate
4Published answer pages
“Nine days, four pages, about 73% mention, 0% cite. Claude 72%, Gemini 81%, ChatGPT 67%, Perplexity 72% mentioned. Cited: none.”
AP
Appear probe measurementenvisionwealth.us, first 9 days

The Challenge

Envision Wealth is a new Appear customer. The first four pages are live. The probe window is nine days.

Mention arrived fast. Cite did not. A 73% mention on a four-page footprint is not a finished case. It is the opening reading.

Gemini mentions the firm most often in this window and still does not cite it.

Before Appear

  • No Appear pages.
  • No probe series.
  • Wealth prompts citing national brands.
  • Zero-day mention and cite.

After Implementation

  • 4 pages live.
  • About 73% mention after 9 days.
  • 0% cite.
  • Too early for a paired first-21 versus last-21 window.

Platform Performance

Citation rate growth across major LLMs after implementation.

ChatGPT mention0% cite
Baseline: 0%Current: 67%
Perplexity mention0% cite
Baseline: 0%Current: 72%
Claude mention0% cite
Baseline: 0%Current: 72%
Gemini mention0% cite
Baseline: 0%Current: 81%

Implementation Timeline

Day 0

Site created

Appear opened the account and the first question set.

First days

Four pages published

The opening advisory pages went live.

Day 9

Named, not cited

Mention is already in the 70s. Cite is still zero. Remeasure after a real publish cohort.

New advisory firm that AI can say and will not link?

Appear will publish the next pages and wait for cite. Nine days is a reading, not a victory lap.

Book a Demo